Are you walking the fine line between enforcing community rules and risking a devastating fair housing retaliation claim? The stakes are high: enforcing a lease after a resident complains or issuing notices after a bad review can be misinterpreted instantly. In this essential episode, a fair housing attorney breaks down the blurry line between lawful rule enforcement and unlawful retaliation under the Fair Housing Act. Find out what protected conduct means, how timing is critical, and the proactive steps property managers must take to safeguard their companies and ensure compliance. Can you afford not to know this?
Key Timestamps/Highlights:
- 00:00 – Retaliation vs. Rule Enforcement: Defining the difference under the Fair Housing Act.
- 01:30 – Protected Conduct: Examples of resident actions that trigger retaliation risk.
- 02:33 – The Role of Timing: Why the window between a complaint and an adverse action matters.
- 03:27 – Common Retaliation Scenarios: Examples like non-renewing leases due to excessive complaints.
- 04:41 – HUD Complaints & Lease Violations: How to manage valid violations post-complaint without escalating risk.
- 05:31 – Consistent Enforcement is Key: Why you can’t stop enforcing rules, even after a complaint.
- 06:42 – Proactive Prevention: Training, second opinions, and policies to reduce retaliation claims.
- 07:47 – Don’t Go It Alone: The crucial need for manager consultation on adverse actions
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed