The assumption that the Fair Housing Act (FHA) is exclusively a concern for rental properties is a dangerous misconception that exposes Homeowners Associations (HOAs) and property managers to significant legal liability. The fundamental legal truth is that the FHA applies to virtually all housing providers, including most HOAs and community associations. Failure to scrutinize the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CCNRs) and rules of the HOAs you manage can quickly turn a minor policy detail into a major legal crisis.
This is a critical area of oversight, as many employees and individuals involved with non-rental entities—such as home developers, management companies, condo boards, and mortgage companies—are often unaware of or untrained on FHA compliance.
Table of Contents
The Biggest Areas of FHA Vulnerability for HOAs:
The vast majority of FHA litigation stems from two specific protected classes: disability and familial status.
Disability: Over 50% of all Fair Housing Act complaints annually involve discrimination based on disability. The primary concerns involve requests for reasonable accommodations and modifications.
Modifications: If a resident requires installing a ramp for access—a reasonable modification—the HOA must generally allow it, though the expense is typically borne by the resident.
Emotional Support Animals (ESAs): An HOA must consider a resident’s request for an ESA as a reasonable accommodation, even if the HOA has a strict “no pets” policy in its covenants. Denying this without a legitimate, FHA-compliant reason is a violation of the law.
Familial Status: This refers to the presence of children under the age of 18 in the household. HOAs cannot implement rules that effectively discourage or restrict families with children.
HOPA Exception: Limiting children is discriminatory unless the community strictly qualifies for housing for older persons under the Housing for Older Persons Act (HOPA). Seek counsel if you are unsure if your property qualifies.
Red Flags: Restrictive rules like “no children allowed in the pool after 6 PM” or specific occupancy limits (e.g., “only two people can occupy a two-bedroom unit”) disproportionately affect families and are major red flags.
Disparate Impact and Enforcement:
Even policies that appear neutral on the surface can violate the law if their effect is discriminatory, a concept known as disparate impact. Additionally, inconsistent or non-biased enforcement constitutes discriminatory enforcement.
Example Scenarios:
- Strictly enforcing vehicle registration rules that disproptionatley effect a protected category can create a discriminatory effect.
- An occupancy limit that seems neutral but disproportionately excludes larger families can create a disparate impact violation.
It is essential for property managers to ensure consistent, non-biased enforcement of all rules. While HUD recently issued a memo prioritizing cases of intentional discrimination due to a backlog, the disparate impact theory of liability still absolutely exists and is applied by courts.
Key Takeaways for Property Managers and HOA Boards:
- Audit Your Rules: Proactively review governing documents, rules, and enforcement practices.
- Focus on Training: Diligently train all board members and decision-makers on FHA compliance.
- Understand Liability: A violation by the board can open the management company and individual board members up to liability, and vice versa. HOA board members can be individually named in FHA lawsuits.
- Seek Guidance: Ignorance of the law is not a defense, and legal compliance is always cheaper than litigation.
You might also be interested in:
- The Fair Housing Act Applies to HOAs: What Property Managers Must Know
- The Fair Housing Act: From 1968 Landmark to Modern Compliance Challenges
- Hoarding and Fair Housing: The Property Manager’s Compliance Guide
- Fair Housing’s 3 Non-Negotiables: A Property Manager’s Essential Survival Guide
- Preventing Staff Harassment in Property Management
